Cerebellum and Navigation

Navigation requires us to dynamically orient our own presence with the position of our different body parts.

Sidestepping a hole in the sidewalk may seem simple. What leads up to such motion, however, is a series of complex calculations performed by specialized cells deep in the cerebellum, according to a new study in monkeys. “Navigating through our world requires our ability to take our own presence and position of our different body parts and dynamically orient them in the surrounding world,” says David Dickman, co-author of the study and a professor of anatomy and neurobiology at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. “One of the main problems of the brain is how to coordinate the information about the body in space to space itself.” The brain receives information on the body’s movement and orientation from the vestibular system in the inner ear. But vestibular sensors track head position only and cannot distinguish between movement and gravitational force, presenting a computation problem for this type of navigation. Scientists suspected that inertial motion was calculated by combining rotational signals from the semicircular canal in the inner ear with gravity signals. However, which neurons in the brain were responsible for these computations was unknown. Dickman and colleagues focused on Purkinje cells, neurons found in a region of the cerebellum that receives information from the vestibular system. During the study, the monkeys’ heads were guided through a precise series of rotations and accelerations while the scientists measured the electrical activity of the Purkinje cells. In the June 21 issue of Neuron, the researchers report that Purkinje cells do, in fact, perform calculations to determine inertial motion, offering what they call an “elegant solution” to the computational problems involved in inertial navigation. Researchers now plan to examine how perception of motion occurs and how it combines with other sensory experiences to provide a complete picture of moving relative to objects.

cerebellum, navigation, navigate, motion, vestibular, system

  • ID: 857
  • Source: DNALC.G2C

Related Content

1064. Neurodevelopment - Axon Guidance

Professor David Van Vactor describes how axons grow during neurodevelopment.

  • ID: 1064
  • Source: G2C

2112. Subiculum

The subiculum is the main output region of the hippocampus and is important to learning and memory. It plays a role in spatial navigation, symbol processing, and the stress response.

  • ID: 2112
  • Source: G2C

1065. Growth Cones (1)

Professor David Van Vactor explains how growth cones guide axons during neurodevelopment.

  • ID: 1065
  • Source: G2C

2109. Hippocampus

The hippocampus is closely aligned to memory formation. It is an important early storage place for long–term memory, and is involved in the transition to more enduring permanent memory.

  • ID: 2109
  • Source: G2C

1085. Philosophy of Mind

Professor Marc Hauser explains that philosophy of mind is a branch of philosophy that is concerned with the nature of consciousness.

  • ID: 1085
  • Source: G2C

1128. Parietal Lobe

The parietal cortex plays an important role in integrating information from different senses to build a coherent picture of the world.

  • ID: 1128
  • Source: G2C

844. Sleeping Brain

In the sleeping brain, the hippocampus strengthens memory by going over the day’s events.

  • ID: 844
  • Source: G2C

1288. Neuroimaging and Autism

Neuroimaging studies of autism highlight a dysfunctional mirror neuron system, particularly in an area called the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

  • ID: 1288
  • Source: G2C

1363. Genes for memory (lesson)

Students will experiment with an interactive animation to compare mutant and wild-type mice in a water maze. They will analyze data and discuss findings of a research paper.

  • ID: 1363
  • Source: G2C

16982. The Eye and Irreducible Complexity - Creationism Debunked

Part 3 of a 7-part series with Dr. Eugenie C. Scott: Intelligent Design, Irreducible Complexity, and the Eye. Dr. Scott criticizes claims by proponents of creation science that the vertebrate eye is too complex a mechanism to have evolved by natural sel

  • ID: 16982
  • Source: DNALC